Current:Home > BackJustice Department pushes ahead with antitrust case against Google, questions ex-employee on deals-LoTradeCoin
Justice Department pushes ahead with antitrust case against Google, questions ex-employee on deals
View Date:2024-12-24 03:26:47
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department pressed ahead with its antitrust case against Google Wednesday, questioning a former employee of the search engine giant about deals he helped negotiate with phone companies in the 2000s.
Chris Barton, who worked for Google from 2004 to 2011, testified that he made it a priority to negotiate for Google to be the default search engine on mobile devices. In exchange, phone service providers or manufacturers were offered a share of revenue generated when users clicked on ads.
In the biggest antitrust case in a quarter century, the government is arguing that Google has rigged the market in its favor by locking in its search engine as the one users see first on their devices, shutting out competition and smothering innovation.
Google counters that it dominates the internet search market because its product is better than the competition. Even when it holds the default spot on smartphones and other devices, it argues, users can switch to rival search engines with a couple of clicks.
And Barton testified that Google wasn’t the only search engine seeking default status with phone companies.
In a 2011 email exchange, Google executives noted that AT&T chose Yahoo and Verizon went with Microsoft’s Bing as its search engine.
“I faced a challenge because mobile carriers became fixed on revenue share percentage,’' Barton said Wednesday. To counter the competition, he tried to persuade potential partners that Google’s high-quality searches would generate more clicks — and therefore more advertising revenue — even if the carriers were paid a nominally lower percentage.
Google has emerged as the dominant player in internet searches, accounting for about 90% of the market. The Justice Department filed its antitrust lawsuit against the company nearly three years ago during the Trump administration, alleging Google has used its internet search dominance to gain an unfair advantage against competitors.
The trial, which began Tuesday, is expected to last 10 weeks.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta likely won’t issue a ruling until early next year. If he decides Google broke the law, another trial will decide what steps should be taken to rein in the Mountain View, California-based company.
Top executives at Google and its corporate parent Alphabet Inc., as well as those from other powerful technology companies are expected to testify. Among them is likely to be Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, who succeeded Google co-founder Larry Page four years ago. Court documents also suggest that Eddy Cue, a high ranking Apple executive, might be called to the stand.
On Wednesday, the Justice Department also questioned Google chief economist Hal Varian for a second day about the way the company uses the massive amounts of data generated by user clicks to improve future searches and entrench its advantage over rivals.
____
Michael Liedtke contributed to this story.
veryGood! (77246)
Related
- MLS Star Marco Angulo Dead at 22 One Month After Car Crash
- Everything You Need for that Coastal Cool Home Aesthetic We All Can’t Get Enough of
- They opened a Haitian food truck. Then they were told, ‘Go back to your own country,’ lawsuit says
- What if the government abolished your 401(k)? Economists say accounts aren't worth it
- Horoscopes Today, November 13, 2024
- Dismembered goats, chicken found at University of Rochester: Deaths may be 'religious in nature'
- US water polo star prepares for Paris Olympics as husband battles lung cancer
- Repeat Super Bowl matchups: List of revenge games ahead of Chiefs-49ers second meeting
- Kentucky gets early signature win at Champions Classic against Duke | Opinion
- Kentucky House passes bill to bolster disclosure of sexual misconduct allegations against teachers
Ranking
- Golden Bachelorette: Joan Vassos Gets Engaged During Season Finale
- Millions could place legal bets on the Super Bowl. Just not in California or Missouri
- Why is there an ADHD medication shortage in 2024? What's making generics of Vyvanse, Adderall and more so scarce
- Federal trial of former Memphis officers in Tyre Nichols beating death pushed back 4 months
- Week 10 fantasy football rankings: PPR, half-PPR and standard leagues
- NYC vigilantes 'Guardian Angels' tackle New Yorker on live TV, misidentify him as migrant
- We Can't Keep Our Lips Sealed Over Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen's Rare Outing With Sister Elizabeth Olsen
- A criminal actor is to blame for a dayslong cyberattack on a Chicago hospital, officials say
Recommendation
-
ONA Community Introduce
-
Jennifer Garner Reveals Why 13 Going on 30 Costar Mark Ruffalo Almost Quit the Film
-
Kentucky House passes bill to bolster disclosure of sexual misconduct allegations against teachers
-
Boy’s death at therapy program didn’t appear natural, but sheriff says they’re awaiting cause
-
Wendi McLendon-Covey talks NBC sitcom 'St. Denis Medical' and hospital humor
-
US applications for unemployment benefits fall again despite recent layoff announcements
-
Judge: Louisiana legislative districts dilute Black voting strength, violate the Voting Rights Act
-
Usher to discuss upcoming Super Bowl halftime show in Las Vegas